← All projects

03 / Circular systems

Circular Healthcare

A roadmap for turning hospital plastic waste into circular products through better sorting, specialist partners and a shared recycling foundation.

Context
Final bachelor project · TU Delft
Focus
Healthcare waste, recycling policy and circular business models
Isometric concept illustration of a hospital plastic recycling facility
Concept illustration for the proposed hospital plastic recycling system.
01 / The challenge

From mixed waste to usable material

The onepager describes a system in which the MCL does not separate clean and contaminated plastic: it is classified as SZA and sent for incineration. The hospital generates around 146 tonnes of plastic waste each year. Existing waste contracts, including the IFZ arrangement, also make a change difficult to introduce quickly.

Recycling requires more than collecting the material. Contaminated plastic has to be cleaned, and the resulting sterile but mixed granules must be sorted into single-material streams before they can be used again. Only a small number of Dutch companies can clean this waste, while large facilities such as KSI are needed to sort it at scale.

Roadmap showing hospital plastic moving through collection, processing, sorting and production before returning as circular products.
The proposed loop connects hospital waste to processing, sorting and the production of new circular products.
02 / A staged route

Start with partners, build capability over time

Because the MCL and Hartplastic are not waste processors, the roadmap proposes entry-level partnerships instead of requiring them to buy and operate every recycling machine themselves. The options build from processing only clean waste, through processing all SZA with a partner such as Innomax, to taking on cleaning and shredding, adding production, or processing all SZA and making products in-house.

These are alternative steps toward greater involvement, not claims that each stage is already operating. They make it possible to match investment and responsibility to the partners and capabilities available.

Five progressively involved recycling models, from having clean waste processed to processing SZA and producing products in-house.
Five entry-level models outline how partners could take on more of the recycling chain over time.
03 / Shared infrastructure

A foundation in Friesland

The proposed foundation would bring several stages together centrally in Friesland: shredding, cleaning and making new products. Fewer separate hand-offs could reduce transport while giving the partners a shared place to turn recovered material into useful products.

The stakeholder map brings together the MCL, the foundation, possible partners, decontaminators, sorters, producers and grant providers. The onepager also proposes equipment including an Ecoteryl 75 and a Milacron Elektron Evo 275 injection-moulding machine with a mould. These are part of the proposal, not equipment confirmed as purchased or installed.

Stakeholder map connecting the MCL and a proposed foundation with decontaminators, sorters, producers, possible partners and grant providers.
The foundation is positioned as a connector between waste producers, processing partners, manufacturers and funders.
Milacron Elektron Evo 275 injection-moulding machine shown in the onepager as proposed equipment.
Milacron Elektron Evo 275 injection-moulding machine, proposed for producing new parts.
Ecoteryl 75 recycling machine shown in the onepager as proposed equipment.
Ecoteryl 75, included in the onepager’s proposed recycling equipment.
04 / Road to 2030

Policy goals and expected impact

The MCL and Hartplastic aim to reuse and separate as much plastic as possible, in line with Green Deal 3.0 ambitions. The onepager sets out goals for 2030 and 2050: improve health and climate awareness among clients, patients and staff; reduce CO₂ emissions by 55% by 2030 and reach climate neutrality by 2050; halve primary raw-material use by 2030; and work toward maximum circular care by 2050. It also calls for reducing the environmental impact of medication use.

The project presents potential benefits rather than measured results: circular products could reduce waste costs by 24.8%; circular production could emit 42.5% less than producing new plastic; and recycling rather than incineration could avoid 2.2 kg of CO₂ per kilogram of plastic. The onepager also cites €1.25 per kilogram as the waste cost if the current contract is broken.

Green Deal 3.0 target icons for health promotion, climate awareness, lower CO2 emissions, reduced raw-material use and less environmental impact from medication.
The onepager links the recycling proposal to healthcare, climate and resource-use targets for 2030 and 2050.
Project text and visuals adapted from the Road to 2030 project onepager. Read the full portfolio ↗
Next projectVehicle Interior Model